US sanctions Iranian morality police after woman's death Show
WASHINGTON - The U.S. government on Thursday imposed sanctions on Iran's morality police and leaders of other government agencies after the death of a woman who'd been detained... Read more ... Wish fulfilled: A 90-year-old woman in Mississippi earned an honorary GEDLooking back on her 90 years, she said the one thing she wished she had done was finish high school. Read more ... America gained 2.5 million new millionaires last yearAs many as 5.2 million people became millionaires last year, with nearly half in the United States alone. Read more ... Omaha man sentenced to jail for misdemeanor motor vehicle homicideA Douglas County judge gives an Omaha man a month in jail for his role in a deadly motorcycle crash. Read more ... Russians flee, protest as mobilization announcedLarge numbers of Russians rushed to book one-way tickets out of the country while they still could Wednesday after Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a partial... Read more ... More than 23,000 athletes, including nearly 200 from New Hampshire, apply...During the five-day registration window for the Boston Marathon, more than 23,000 people applied to run. Read more ... NASA's planetary defense mission will test asteroid deflection, but how...NASA's DART mission mimics what scientists would do if an asteroid were headed toward Earth, but there are a few differences compared to defense against a real asteroid impact. Read more ... Satellites track 5 storms as Atlantic hurricane season heats upSatellites watch the Atlantic hurricane season of 2022 pick up momentum after a slow start as hurricane Fiona becomes a Category 4 hurricane and four more tropical depressions... Read more ... Coroner releases name of Upstate ATV driver killed a day before his birthdayThe coroner has released the name of the ATV driver who died just a day before his birthday. Read more ... Senate ratifies global treaty curbing climate superpollutantsRead more ... First came a piece in The New York Times Magazine, called “Does a More Equal Marriage Mean Less Sex?” The article suggested that the very qualities that lead to greater emotional satisfaction in marriage—sharing of household responsibilities and child rearing along with having two breadwinners—may be having an unexpectedly negative impact on the sex lives of these otherwise happy couples. In heterosexual marriages where men did more of the traditionally female chores, like laundry and dish-washing and preparing meals, they were not only having less frequent sex than those staying in more gender-stereotyped roles, but the women also reported being less satisfied with the sex they did have. In other words, things were sexier in relationships where men stuck to fixing the car, doing home repairs and mowing the lawn. Despite the half-joke of my male client who insisted that his wife’s favorite form of foreplay was watching him vacuum, the cited research said the opposite — that while women felt emotionally closer to their more participatory husbands, no amount of dusting, folding, or dish-doing translated to their having more passionate sex. Apparently, what drives happiness does not drive lust. The day the article came out, I was at a friend’s birthday party, where a good number of guests asked what I, as a couples therapist, thought of the article’s premise. “Every day I see people obsessed with fairness and parity,” I said, “people unable to be flexible, unable to collaborate, many of them keeping close track of who does what and quibbling about the inequities. “I’d say an even bigger libido killer would be the ridiculously high expectations that couples have about marriage, about what they should get from their marriage and how passionate they should feel— not to mention the sheer exhaustion of the high-intensity lifestyle so many of us lead.” As we were saying goodbye to our hosts, my husband made this parting comment: “I’m going to go get the car, but first I think I’ll rebuild the engine,” he said, giving me a flirtatious wink and then slightly flexing his muscles, as if to undoubtedly assure hot sex once we got home. Nothing about marriage is simple. Nor is there an easy answer about how to sustain sexual desire beyond courtship and on through the stress-filled years of child rearing… and beyond that. In my post about the 35 Things I Learned In 35 Years of Marriage, I said that a person’s definition of sexy will change over time. To me, sexy is my husband going out in the pouring rain to latch the slamming back gate. But equally appealing is seeing him in an apron making our dinner. Next up in the series of articles was one that I found deeply depressing, a somewhat cynical piece in which the writer, the editor of the Times’ Modern Love column, claimed that couples address marital malaise in one of three ways: they sneak (as in sneak around and contact old flames via Facebook); they quash (as in accept marriage for the “limited” thing that it is, “running the gamut from the bitterly resigned to the appreciatively so” ) or they somewhat zealously aim to restore (as in consume self-help books, go to marriage enrichment groups and learn to tango.) Sneakers? Quashers? Restorers? He seems to have left out one group. People who are satisfied and reasonably happy and don’t view their having come to terms with imperfection as resignation at all. A group we might call the Good-Enoughers. Then came yet another New York Times piece, this time from Eli Finkel, a psychology professor at Northwestern University. In it he raised the following question: “Are marriages today better or worse than they used to be?” No big surprise, his answer is both. Average marriages — the okay but not great ones — are resulting in more divorce and unhappiness than in times past. The best marriages, however, are stronger and are providing unprecedented levels of satisfaction. While the article discussed various historical and socio-economic factors that explain this trend, a key point was that the happiest couples are those with high standards and a willingness to work hard to achieve them. And some of the unhappiest are those who want what they want, at no cost. Today, more than any other time in history, couples are expecting that their marriages will have it all. Passion. Eroticism. Shared interests. Companionship. We’re seeking scintillating conversation, and deep emotional connection. We want to grow and develop and we want our spouse to grow, too. It’s no longer enough to be good friends or good parents, to be cooperative householders, to have sex that’s makes us feel closer but doesn’t send us over the moon. What used to be considered adequate or even better than adequate for our parents or grandparents has, today, come to be too little to ask. Complicating all this is the fact that while couples are looking to get more out of their marriages than ever, they are putting less in. Less time, less less focus, less effort. People are working longer hours, going to the gym after work, driving their children from one activity to the next, and then falling into bed with their nose in their iPad. Yet these same people are wanting deeper connection and high levels of personal growth and self-actualization. They’re finding their marriages less than satisfying, and to me the reasons are obvious. As partners, I believe we’re left with a choice: we can lower our sky-high expectations or we can ask more of ourselves. A wise approach may be somewhat of a combo — to set high standards for what we put in, while accepting that marriage is imperfect, like all things in life. Perhaps the key is to strive for good as opposed to over-the-moon, to take pleasure in the sweet things and know that all things are
not sweet. After all, a good enough marriage is, in fact, a great thing. Want a FREE gift? Sign up and get the Speaking of Marriage Gift Pack: 75 Ways To Improve Your Relationship Starting Today— plus weekly blog posts delivered straight to your inbox! For this week’s cartoon check out my Facebook page! At what stage of marriage is a divorce most likely?While there are countless divorce studies with conflicting statistics, the data points to two periods during a marriage when divorces are most common: years 1 – 2 and years 5 – 8. Of those two high-risk periods, there are two years in particular that stand out as the most common years for divorce — years 7 and 8.
What is a good enough reason for divorce?The Austin Institute for The Study of Family and Culture using data from 4,000 divorced adults, identified the top reasons for divorce as to why people break up in the United States to include infidelity by either party; spouse unresponsive to needs; incompatibility; Spouse immaturity; emotional abuse and financial ...
Is it possible to have a healthy divorce?Separation and divorce are emotionally difficult events, but it is possible to have a healthy breakup. No one enters into a marriage expecting it to fail.
Is divorce better than an unhappy marriage?A 2002 study found that two-thirds of unhappy adults who stayed together were happy five years later. They also found that those who divorced were no happier, on average, than those who stayed together. In other words, most people who are unhappily married—or cohabiting—end up happy if they stick at it.
|
Can a good enough marriage make for a great divorce
Copyright © 2024 toptenid.com Inc.
